Knowledge Resources Why is the 'Simplify Mesh by amount' process necessary for 3D-printed lattices? Optimize Your FEA Workflow Efficiency
Author avatar

Tech Team · 3515

Updated 1 week ago

Why is the 'Simplify Mesh by amount' process necessary for 3D-printed lattices? Optimize Your FEA Workflow Efficiency


Simplifying the mesh is a critical optimization step required to make the simulation of complex 3D-printed parts computationally viable. By reducing the number of triangles in the surface mesh, this process significantly lowers file sizes and computational costs, allowing Finite Element Analysis (FEA) tools to process the geometry efficiently.

While complex lattice structures provide advanced mechanical properties, their raw geometric data is often too dense for standard simulation workflows. Mesh simplification bridges this gap by reducing data volume without compromising the structural features necessary for accurate stiffness prediction.

The Challenge of Lattice Geometries

Managing Excessive Data Density

Advanced lattice structures, such as Gyroid or Schwarz units, are mathematically complex. When these shapes are generated for 3D printing, they result in surface meshes composed of millions of tiny triangles.

Attempting to feed this raw, high-density mesh directly into simulation software often leads to unmanageable file sizes. This creates a bottleneck before the analysis even begins.

The Computational Bottleneck

Finite Element Analysis relies on dividing a model into smaller elements to calculate physical responses. If the input mesh is overly dense, the solver must generate an excessive number of elements.

This exponentially increases the computational resources required. Without simplification, simulations may crash due to memory limits or take an impractical amount of time to converge.

How Simplification Optimizes Analysis

Reducing Overhead, Not Accuracy

The goal of the 'Simplify Mesh by amount' process is to remove redundancy. It targets areas where a high triangle count does not contribute meaningfully to the shape's definition.

By optimizing the allocation of triangles, you reduce the computational load significantly. This ensures that your hardware resources are focused on solving the physics, rather than managing geometry.

Preserving Geometric Features

Effective simplification is intelligent. It maintains the integrity of key geometric features that define the structure's mechanical behavior.

For applications like footwear soles, where specific lattice units dictate performance, retaining the accurate shape of the unit cell is vital. This allows the FEA simulation to correctly predict mechanical properties, such as stiffness, despite the lower triangle count.

Understanding the Trade-offs

Balancing Speed and Fidelity

There is an inherent tension between mesh density and simulation speed. Aggressive simplification yields the fastest results but risks smoothing out critical details.

The Risk of Over-Simplification

If you reduce the mesh count too drastically, you may alter the physical topology of the lattice. In a Gyroid structure, for example, over-simplification could artificial thicken or thin struts.

This introduces error into the simulation. The FEA results might predict a stiffness that differs from the actual printed part, rendering the analysis misleading.

Making the Right Choice for Your Simulation

To ensure your FEA results are both timely and accurate, align your simplification strategy with your immediate engineering goals.

  • If your primary focus is rapid design iteration: Apply a higher amount of simplification to minimize calculation time and quickly compare relative stiffness between different lattice concepts.
  • If your primary focus is final validation: Use a lower amount of simplification to ensure maximum geometric fidelity, accepting the cost of longer simulation times for higher precision.

By strategically reducing mesh complexity, you transform an unmanageable dataset into an actionable model ready for engineering insight.

Summary Table:

Optimization Factor Impact of High-Density Mesh Benefits of Mesh Simplification
Computational Speed Extremely slow / High risk of crashes Significant reduction in processing time
File Size Large, unmanageable datasets Streamlined files for easier data transfer
Hardware Load High memory and CPU consumption Optimized resource allocation for physics solving
Geometric Fidelity Exact, but often redundant detail Intelligent retention of critical mechanical features
Simulation Goal Difficult to achieve rapid iterations Enables quick comparison of design concepts

Elevate Your Footwear Innovation with 3515

As a large-scale manufacturer serving global distributors and brand owners, 3515 leverages advanced production capabilities to turn complex lattice designs into high-performance footwear. Our expertise ensures that whether you are developing cutting-edge training shoes or durable tactical boots, your structural innovations are matched by world-class manufacturing precision.

From our flagship Safety Shoes series to specialized outdoor, sneakers, and formal dress shoes, we offer the comprehensive bulk production capacity you need to scale your brand. Let us help you bridge the gap between digital simulation and market-ready products.

Ready to scale your footwear production? Contact us today to discuss your bulk manufacturing requirements.

References

  1. Mohammad Javad Hooshmand, Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker. Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Mechanical Stiffness of Lattice Structure-Based Polymer Foam. DOI: 10.3390/ma16227173

This article is also based on technical information from 3515 Knowledge Base .

People Also Ask


Leave Your Message